<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CUNY Demolishes Historic Queens Building</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.architakes.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.architakes.com/?p=432</link>
	<description>on architecture in New York and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:03:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.architakes.com/?p=432&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.architakes.com/?p=432#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the significant research and exposure on this humble structure. It certainly demonstrates the political momentum that CUNY has, given it&#039;s decision to encumber capital funds and approve DASNY to proceed prior to SHPO&#039;s approval. Any other owner would certainly see such action as an extreme risk. Clearly CUNY carried no risk in proceeding early. I remain surprised at the lack of press or public interest in CUNY&#039;s capital expenditures. Although the institution has shown excellent growth, its Chancellor doesn&#039;t appear to answer directly to anyone. Bloomberg shows no interest, nor does Patterson. CUNY appears to encumber and spend its significant public dollars unchecked and unchallenged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the significant research and exposure on this humble structure. It certainly demonstrates the political momentum that CUNY has, given it&#8217;s decision to encumber capital funds and approve DASNY to proceed prior to SHPO&#8217;s approval. Any other owner would certainly see such action as an extreme risk. Clearly CUNY carried no risk in proceeding early. I remain surprised at the lack of press or public interest in CUNY&#8217;s capital expenditures. Although the institution has shown excellent growth, its Chancellor doesn&#8217;t appear to answer directly to anyone. Bloomberg shows no interest, nor does Patterson. CUNY appears to encumber and spend its significant public dollars unchecked and unchallenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kim-Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.architakes.com/?p=432&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kim-Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.architakes.com/?p=432#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The demolition of this fine, architecturally interesting industrial structure is sad and really a bit obscene especially in light of the long term artistic value it&#039;s rehabilitation would have given CUNY and the city as a whole. CUNY cannot fall upon it&#039;s mission statement to act so barbarically in destroying buildings with such merit - especially if it merely intends to pave over them!! What a bunch of complete morons!! What a terrible example the administrators set with their knuckle-headed sophistry. Few things are more sickening than this sheer vandalism made worse when executed by a state institution of higher learning. Culturally criminal - the individuals responsible should be brought up before a board of review. Alas that will not save this humble little architectural gem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The demolition of this fine, architecturally interesting industrial structure is sad and really a bit obscene especially in light of the long term artistic value it&#8217;s rehabilitation would have given CUNY and the city as a whole. CUNY cannot fall upon it&#8217;s mission statement to act so barbarically in destroying buildings with such merit &#8211; especially if it merely intends to pave over them!! What a bunch of complete morons!! What a terrible example the administrators set with their knuckle-headed sophistry. Few things are more sickening than this sheer vandalism made worse when executed by a state institution of higher learning. Culturally criminal &#8211; the individuals responsible should be brought up before a board of review. Alas that will not save this humble little architectural gem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
